Actually the photograph had been taken with splendid technical. The tone and light give a little bit art aspect. And more important, it has a great historical.
But it has been scanned with bad maintenance.
Impermanent I think you trying to give an art sense. But several element like dusts, bad crop, noises has not good contribution to the picture overall.
schwarzweiss 60 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
contraAlfred Spectrum 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
cJan Van Der Hooft 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
contJutta.M. 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
proKlaus der Sandmann 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
It's grain and not noise.don ricchilino 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
+++ivano cheli (2) 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
-Arno M 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
:-)))Ralph Bache 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
CONTRAMichael Henderson 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
contraGeoff Ashton 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
contraLuc Grollie 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
oh yes, oh yes, .....this sure belongs in .comgallery !!!!!!!greetz,
christian ... art-n-visions 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
i like the corn - it's real... probably that's why... ;)the dust... well - could be ab issue... but not negative for me :))
i primarily like this picture... it has a certrain mood - is well done a good all over crop...
so... that's a pro for me :)
Dominique Duriot 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
sorry contraaw masry 29/09/2007 14:22 Commento di voto
Actually the photograph had been taken with splendid technical. The tone and light give a little bit art aspect. And more important, it has a great historical.But it has been scanned with bad maintenance.
Impermanent I think you trying to give an art sense. But several element like dusts, bad crop, noises has not good contribution to the picture overall.
Agree with Robert, but SKIP