For me it looks like the biggest part of the image is digitally generated. Perhaps I'm wrong.
The part I recognize as an image (the left side) is not sharp. I think sharpness is not everything, but in pictures like these it's essential (imho).
contra
Claire L. 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
+Rosa Phil-Li 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
+Jürgen Cron 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
+archiek 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
contraMicha Boland 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
+++Oliver Suhr 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
-Johann Pondorfer 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
+Ralf Kesper 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
+Stefan Seith von Benrath 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
+Volker Vontin 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
+++++lg Volker
http://www.photokunst.vontin.net/
Doc Kramer 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
+aw masry 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
With @Andrea se.But SKIP because well graphic composition :-)
regineheuser 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
+Andrea Sagawe 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
For me it looks like the biggest part of the image is digitally generated. Perhaps I'm wrong.The part I recognize as an image (the left side) is not sharp. I think sharpness is not everything, but in pictures like these it's essential (imho).
contra
lord of the blue seas 22/01/2008 0:20 Commento di voto
+