Pro, despite the 'Moon'. The real Moon has detail - it's not just a blank spot. And I don't think this was shot with enough zoom to get the Moon this big. Either put a real Moon there or remove the perforation (because that's what it looks like).
Oh, I now read it isn't fake. That really surprises me. How did you lose the detail? Overexposure would have resulted in flare, wouldn't it? The perfect shape makes it look fake, even if it isn't.
If it looked like this straight from the camera, then I've got a dilemma. What counts more? That it *looks* real or that is *is* real?
Albert Wirtz 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
proHans-Reiner Bohn 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
°P°R°O°Anne-Marie Frei 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
proMAURICE CLEGG 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
****PRO****Dirk van der Made 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
Pro, despite the 'Moon'. The real Moon has detail - it's not just a blank spot. And I don't think this was shot with enough zoom to get the Moon this big. Either put a real Moon there or remove the perforation (because that's what it looks like).Oh, I now read it isn't fake. That really surprises me. How did you lose the detail? Overexposure would have resulted in flare, wouldn't it? The perfect shape makes it look fake, even if it isn't.
If it looked like this straight from the camera, then I've got a dilemma. What counts more? That it *looks* real or that is *is* real?
Norbert Bone 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
***PRO***Hans-Peter aus München 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
+++R.Sliwi 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
PROZsolt Kiss 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
PRO! :o)ScenicPhotos 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
proHubert Reuther 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
+++PRO+++Volker Lenk 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
wow! pro!markus hiepold 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
+++lemmi65 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
+++++++++Jean-Bernard 09/11/2008 21:33 Commento di voto
PRO+
+