using a 1.4 ...the dof can become like that.
i had seen that u r a free member and so u can not comment anything on the voting.
so i am sorry about that !
nothing at else...if with ps or not....the dof is not well.
and my opion is.the blury parts are to strange !
on a position of the model like that the 1.4 is to less.
also i had missed the sharpenss in the eye...it is ok...
bt cloud be better !
The idea is PRO.
The result? I don't like the dof of the neck. It gives some strange feeling, like the face is not part of that neck....., just mine opinion.
skip
Cristina Indricean 27/07/2010 18:34
very dramatic!Stanislav Truska 04/05/2008 22:50
ma zaujimave ociGabriela Sauciuc 07/11/2007 0:10
++++sebastian romero 08/09/2007 17:05
Michael needs a shower...No, seriously, intimate, connected, well composed portrait. Great light meassurement and editing. Sebastian
°°° celle °°° 05/06/2007 8:04
hi joanna.....using a 1.4 ...the dof can become like that.
i had seen that u r a free member and so u can not comment anything on the voting.
so i am sorry about that !
nothing at else...if with ps or not....the dof is not well.
and my opion is.the blury parts are to strange !
on a position of the model like that the 1.4 is to less.
also i had missed the sharpenss in the eye...it is ok...
bt cloud be better !
cheers
c
Joanna Kustra 05/06/2007 3:32
Thanks for all comments! :) I can assure you that DOF is here 100% natural (no PS) - it was taken by 50mm f/1.4 lens;)Cheers!
Valfoto 04/06/2007 18:37 Commento di voto
sDRAGA PUC 04/06/2007 18:37 Commento di voto
proRoberto Grilli 04/06/2007 18:37 Commento di voto
The idea is PRO.The result? I don't like the dof of the neck. It gives some strange feeling, like the face is not part of that neck....., just mine opinion.
skip
Claudia Hummel 04/06/2007 18:37 Commento di voto
+Tom McAlexander 04/06/2007 18:37 Commento di voto
contraJacqueline Chay 04/06/2007 18:37 Commento di voto
ProBRYAN CRUTE 04/06/2007 18:37 Commento di voto
ProCarlo Pollaci 04/06/2007 18:37 Commento di voto
pro.Claude Coeudevez 04/06/2007 18:37 Commento di voto
pro