Hi there,
Just few words to confirm here the absolute quality of your work.
Your pics are both beautiful AND diverse.
Not only you master the nature 'macro' pics, but also b&w portraits & sky shots.
I guess that's what one calls Talent. ;-)
Greetings,
Barton-
Hi Chris
thanks for YOur kind comment
I gave a look to Your collection and found interesting images - but they suffer from a mistake ....smyle...there are TOO FEW ;-)))
returning from time to time to have another glance on Your works:
chG Liz
Just had wondered if the title was derived from heraldry termonology, that's all. "Sinister" means left. Since the swan was in an unusual pose facing left, just considered you might be into heraldry. I often look for symbols in images.
Well welcome to FC Chris. Great profile, thanks for sharing, will be keeping an eye for more of you. Sinister Swan? In to heraldry? Just wondering, not the usual swan shot. Like your style so far.
xxx xxx 28/08/2005 4:57
Hi there,Just few words to confirm here the absolute quality of your work.
Your pics are both beautiful AND diverse.
Not only you master the nature 'macro' pics, but also b&w portraits & sky shots.
I guess that's what one calls Talent. ;-)
Greetings,
Barton-
Liz Collet 07/08/2005 10:04
Hi Christhanks for YOur kind comment
I gave a look to Your collection and found interesting images - but they suffer from a mistake ....smyle...there are TOO FEW ;-)))
returning from time to time to have another glance on Your works:
chG Liz
When 02/08/2005 21:08
Just had wondered if the title was derived from heraldry termonology, that's all. "Sinister" means left. Since the swan was in an unusual pose facing left, just considered you might be into heraldry. I often look for symbols in images.When 02/08/2005 10:03
Well welcome to FC Chris. Great profile, thanks for sharing, will be keeping an eye for more of you. Sinister Swan? In to heraldry? Just wondering, not the usual swan shot. Like your style so far.Rob Wells 31/07/2005 9:27
Cheers for your comment. I initially had the same concern about the background being a bit too 'busy', so I see what you're saying.However, I didn't quite understand the "2c" reference !!